Viewing 28 - 36 out of 154 Blogs.
Michael Widenius, founder of MySQL, invests in WOT, Web of Trust
Helsinki, Finland (PRWEB) February 16, 2009
Michael "Monty" Widenius, founder of MySQL and a guru for the global open source movement, has invested in WOT, Web of Trust. WOT, a free community-driven security add-on that helps Internet users protect themselves against online threats, closed its second round of funding as the community exceeded 3 million downloads.
"When I first learned about WOT, I was intrigued because it answers the common question Internet users have - Can I trust this website? -by uniquely combining a community-driven approach, Internet resources and browser technology. The growth and success of MySQL was in many aspects due to our active user community. WOT's big and active community shows a similar strength, and I like the fact that through WOT we are helping making the Internet a better and safer place," said Widenius, who will take a seat on the company's Board of Directors.
"We are excited about Monty joining our team and bringing his wealth of knowledge and contact network. Monty had a key role at MySQL when it grew to become an open source icon and the developer of the world's most popular open source database. For Web of Trust this new injection of expertise and capital will help us to expedite our growth and take the company to the next level," said CEO Esa Suurio.
The investors in the second round of funding include Open Ocean, the investment company through which Widenius seeks to invest in disruptive technology start-ups and help them achieve success; and the Finnish Industry Investment Ltd, an existing shareholder.
Protection when browsing and shopping the Internet
Web of Trust offers Internet users preventive protection against Internet scams, identity theft, spyware, spam and unreliable online shops. The WOT security add-on provides safety ratings to search results when using Google, Yahoo!, Wikipedia, Digg and other popular sites, helping users protect their computers and personal information. Website rating information is continuously updated by the user community and from numerous trusted sources, such as listings of malware and phishing sites. The free Internet security add-on works with Internet Explorer and Firefox browsers and can be downloaded at http://www.mywot.com.
Supporting Facts of WOT
WOT has been downloaded by 3 million users
Information on 21 million websites
1 in every 20 websites is harmful
WOT users can contribute by rating and commenting on websites
WOT also receives information from a large number of trusted sources, such as PhishTank, hpHosts, DNS-BH Malware Domain list and Artists Against 419.
WOT videos: http://www.youtube.com/MyWOT
Screen prints, logos and photos:
Note from Cloudeight -
This press release was sent to us from Deborah of Web Of Trust. Deborah is also a member of the Hill, you can visit her page on the Hill at http://notoverthehill.com/deborahs
We use and encourage you to use WOT toolbar. Please read our article on McAfee Site Advisor vs. Web Of Trust (WOT) to see why we no longer recommend Site Advisor and why we do recommend Web Of Trust (WOT). You can read and comment on our article at http://thundercloud.net/infoave/answers/2009/siteadvisor.htm
TC & EB
Tags: Security Toolbars WOT
"...To those of us who knew the pain
Of valentines that never came
And those whose names were never called
When choosing sides for basketball
It was long ago and far away
The world was younger than today
And dreams were all they gave for free
To ugly duckling (guys) like me...."
(Janis Ian "At Seventeen")
To me, February is the worst month of the year.
Though February is the shortest month, it seems like the longest month. February this year, like most years, has twenty-eight days. By the time it is over, it will seem like sixty-two days; at least to those of us who live in the Midwestern United States. Here spring begins on March 21st, according to the calendar; but it doesn't really begin until sometime in ate April.
February is a cruel. cold month. It is the mean, odious, step-mother of months. It leads us into March, that's when spring is supposed to begin. But, March is nothing but a cold, damp, tease. The calendar says spring begins on March 21. But spring does not begin in March. Not really.
February, is a month of wall-to-wall clouds; damp, cold, air; snow, rain, sleet, and ice. February is a month of horrid, cold, dark, ugly weather. Spring is so close yet so far away.We have to get through sixty-two days of February first, and that only gets us into March, there's no spring in March except for a date on the calendar. Each February day brings a slog through the snow, mush, ice, and mud under unending, depressiong gray skies.
I really don't enjoy February. The best thing we have going for us in February around my little town, is waiting for the world's largest rat, in Pennsylvania, to tell us all how many more weeks of winter we have left. I don't need a rat to tell me. I already know. Here's my prediction: We have at least ten more weeks of winter left to go. Now you're all thinking I'm the big rat, aren't you?
If you do live in the northern parts of the Northern Hemisphere, I'm sure you understand what I'm saying. But, if you live in Australia, New Zealand, or some place else in the Southern Hemisphere, you don't have a clue - so bear with me. I want all of you living in the Southern Hemisphere to know you've got problems with February too -- even though you may not know it. Did you ever think that you're being cheated out of three days of summer. It's a fact. Since February falls during your summer season, you're getting cheated out of those long summer days for which I long. At least our last full month of summer, August, has 31 days, but yours only has 28 (except, of course, during leap years). You are cheated out of three glorious summer days. Sorry!
February does have some bright spots at least if you work for the government, schools, or banks. If you're one of those lucky souls, you probably love February, despite the fact that the sun never shines and the February cold pervades every membrane of your body. You love it don't you! You love it because you get yet another day off in February. Presidents' Day is a holiday for you but not for the rest of us poor working stiffs.
President's Day? Humbug! It might be called Presidents' Day, but I have never yet met anyone who sits around and ponders the good deeds, heroics or exploits of George or Abraham on that day. I'll bet that most of you who work for the government, schools, or banks, will be eagerly thumbing through newspapers looking for Presidents' Day Sales. I'll bet that not too many of you who have that day off will spend it pondering these great American presidents or rushing to attend ceremonies honoring them. It looks like Target, Wal-Mart, Neiman-Marcus, for you. Poor old George and Abraham, they're both dead and now used as excuses for more "sales".
Some of you, mostly female I imagine, find another notoriously bright spot stuck smack dab in the middle of February. It's called "Valentine's Day". It's supposed to be a day of romance, but, in my cynical mind, it's a way for Hallmark, American Greetings, and other large purveyors of cardboard poetry to make money. According to the Greeting Card Association, an estimated one billion valentine cards are sent each year. This makes Valentine's Day the second biggest "card-sending" holiday of the year - right behind Christmas with 2.6 billion. Yes, it's true-- eighty-five percent of all Valentine's Day cards are sent by women.
Then of course, there are candies, candles, "romantic items" and other Valentine's Day goodies that fill store shelves from the day after Christmas through the 14th of February. Valentine's Day is a ruse; a marketers dream come true. Money, not "romance" is the engine that drives Valentine's Day. Yes, I'm a cynic. Send me a Valentine's Day card.
Whenever I think of Valentine's Day, I think of myself as a fifth grader. I was not very attractive or popular. I was a fat kid. My mom had just died a few months earlier and I desperately needed attention. Even more than most ten year-olds. I began (pathetically) hoping that the girls in my would feel sorry for me and send me a Valentine's day card. Isn't that sad? Pitiable even. Of course, not many of the girls did. I recall a song by Janis Ian called "At Seventeen" and one of the lines in that song is "For those of us who knew the pain, of Valentines that never came...."
And, in case you think I'm somehow anti-romantic or picking on women here, I'm not. One of the worst things every foisted upon the world is the "Super Bowl". Here we have a football game interrupted by 5 minute commercials, a one-hour halftime, and ridiculous 3 minute "TV timeouts". If I were a football coach I wouldn't even want to play in this media circus. It's a game between two teams that have probably played before - and no one took notice. It's a game that is covered relentlessly by the media for weeks. A game that is more hype than contest; more glitter than substance. Most of us cannot even recall who won the last Super Bowl. And, all the beautiful people will be in attendance. If you're somebody, anybody at all, you're required to make an appearance at "The Super Bowl" to prove you're someone important. Isn't the Super Bowl the height of American superficiality?
I like football (especially college football) and I watch many games during the football season. I often look forward to relaxing on a Saturday afternoon watching college games. But, to me, the "Super Bowl" isn't a football game. I don't have a clue what to call it. But a "football game" doesn't come to mind. I might be the only person not watching the Super Bowl this year. Does that make me strange?
So, besides the interminably long string of short, sunless, damp, cold and dreary days that February dishes up, the tantalizing thought of spring waiting somewhere in the distant future, and the continuation of a long, dark, dreary winter - I have other reasons to dislike the month of February. Its 62 days are stuffed into a calendar of 28. February is but a cruel joke and it plays its joke on me every year.
I remind my friends in Australia, New Zealand and other points in the Southern Hemisphere, that February is not kind to you either. It cheats you out of a few warm and wonderful days of summer.
I always try to accept things as they come but I have a hard time accepting February. It's the one month of the year that I don't like at all. The one month of the year that has no redeeming qualities. Just my luck February has 62 days.
Tags: Winter Spring Summer Fall February Is Worst Of All
The U.S. government throws the number "one trillion" around like it's just another number. Well, it is "just another number" but it's an incredibly big number.
I read an article in the Cleveland Plain Dealer yesterday that puts the number 1,000,000,000,000 in perperspective. The government might not think it's a big deal, but consider these facts:
If you lived one trillion seconds you would 38,166 years old. One trillion seconds ago Neanderthals were walking the Earth. By comparison, the average lifetime of a man is about 2.4 billion seconds. A billion seconds is about 32 years. A billion is a lot, but a trillion is a thousand times a lot.
With one trillion dollars worth of gold you could pave the entire U.S. interstate highway system with 23.5 caret gold.
With one trillion dollars you could buy 1000 boxes of Girl Scout Cookies for every man, woman, and child in the United States.
With one trillion dollars you could buy enough Habitat For Humanity houses to provide homes for 33 million Americans.
With one trillion dollars you could provide a four-year college education for every 2009 high school graduate.
A trillion is a big number to most of us, but to the government it's just another number. In the grand scheme of things, a trillion is a very small number. But then, everything is relative. Light travels almost seven trillion miles in a year and the nearest star system to earth is Andromeda. Andromeda it 4 light years or about 27 trillion miles from Eath. Some stars are millions of light years away. I'm not even going to get into quadrillions, quintillions, or sextillions...but the U.S. government might.
I am not a politician, thank goodness. I'm just your average, everyday citizen who's very concerned about his country and the economic situation we're in. This economic decline is unlike any I've seen in my lifetime - and I'm not a young man; I've seen a lot. I've seen good economic times and bad economic times, but I've never seen times like these.
I've watched as friends who've worked for the same company for years and years, lost their jobs. And these friends didn't have golden parachutes. They're looking for work that pays better than minimum wage, but there's no work to be found. They might well have to become greeters at Walmart or flip burgers at McDonald's before long. All that college for nothing.
I've got another friend who's older than I am and he's watching his retirement account dwindle in a downward spiral that, if it persists, will leave him with next to nothing.
Everywhere I look there is something to remind me that something is not right. I no longer have to wait in line to eat at a favorite restaurant. A factory near my little town, that once employed over 1500, recently went bankrupt. The owners of the company still live in million-dollar homes, but those left without jobs can't afford to pay their mortgages. They're out of work and, apparently out of luck.
I'm not going to get into a partisan debate over whether the Republicans whose ideas of economic recovery are to slash taxes, slash spending and increase freedom - or- the Democrats who think you can spend your way to prosperity are right.
But, it seems we just got through trying increased freedom (read: deregulation) and cutting taxes with the hope that money trickles down from the rich to the poor. I think that's partly how we got into this mess in the first place. The money that was supposed to trickle down from the rich to the poor never trickled, instead it was spent on million-dollar offices, corporate jets and junkets, $300 crystal glasses and $13,000 carpeting for company jets - and who knows what else. Deregulation (i.e. "more freedom") didn't work because Wall Street, bankers and investment firms, unfettered by regulations, ran amuk. Freedom only works if those who are free are also responsible enough to use their freedoms in a responsible way. This harkens to the age-old aphorism about free speech which never meant that you have the right to yell "FIRE!" in a crowded theater.
The Democrats have another way of dealing with economic crises. They want to throw hundreds of billions of dollars at it and hope, somehow, that it all goes away. I think this has been tried too. In fact, I'm sure that FDR tried it in the 1930's and it worked for awhile, but never really pulled the U.S. out of the recession. It took World War II to do that. Let's just hope our government doesn't resort to more wars to bail us out. It seems that we've got more wars going on than we know what to do with -- and war-mongering makes America look bad in the eyes of the rest of the world. World War II could hardly be avoided. Hitler was gobbling up Europe, killing millions of Jews, and Japan bombed Pearl Harbor. Six days after Pearl Harbor, Adolf Hitler declared war on the United States. So, it wasn't like we went looking for war, it was forced upon us. I'm sure we can't say the same for the war in Iraq, although I'm sure there are some that would argue that it too was forced on us.
Now that I've gotten all of you Conservatives and Liberals riled up, let me offer an olive branch. My olive branch is a simple plan to stimulate the economy that I know would work. I don't have much confidence though in how well the government could implement it. Government hasn't tried anything really new in six decades. But extraordinary problems call for extraordinary solutions. Unfortunately, you're not going see anything extraordinary coming out of Washington, no matter which party is in control. Everyone's too busy criticizing everyone else to get anything done. Disraeli once said that "it's easier to be critical than correct."
Anyway, today I'm the President. And, since I am, here is what I propose to solve the current economic crises.
1. Abolish the income tax and replace it with a 10% National Sales Tax (NST) on all retail sales except food and medicine.
2. Abolish all federal withholding for social secuirty and fund it with part of the revenue from the NST plus revenues from a new transaction tax of a few pennies levied on every stock transaction. There are billions of stock transactions each day.
3. Immediately issue a $500 pre-paid government-issued debit card to each single taxpayer or a $1000 pre-paid government-issued debit card to each married taxpayer filing jointly. The debit card would be used like any bank issued debit card. The nice part about this proposal is that the cards could only be used to buy things, not to pay down debt or put money in the bank. Plus, the goverenment would not have to put all the money out at once. The money would be doled out as the cards are used.
4. Start a weekly national lottery. The proceeds from this lottery would be used exclusively for education.
5. Add a 50 cent tax to each gallon of gasoline and use the money to fund the development of alternative fuels.
6. Form a commission to look into legalization of soft drugs (i.e. marijuana), prostitution, and gambling. The way I see it, people are going to engage in these activities anyway, so the government might as well earn tax dollars from them. It seems to me that hundreds of billions of dollars of potential revenue would be generated. Of course, church groups and morality groups would fight this idea big time, but the reality is people are people - always have been and always will be. There's always going to be vice and it's high time we come to grips with it. The huge amount of revenue generated from drugs, prostition and gambling would do a lot of good for society - and decrease the prison population which would also save money. Such a great idea, isn't it?
7. I'd make federal money available to states for infrastructure improvements available only after the states had made the improvements. The federal government would guarantee the loans the states would need to improve existing infrastructure and replace decaying infrastructure. Once the infrastructure improvements and replacements are completed and reviewed, then the government would make federal money available to partially reimburse the states. This way we're not throwing money at the states only to find it's been used to install new carpet in the governors' mansions or buy new jets and helicopters for the governors to fly around in.
I'm not a details kind of guy but I think my ideas are good ideas that would stimulate the economy, create jobs, and get people buying again. I'm sure many economists would not agree with me, but then again, look at the mess we're in righ now and you can't find one single plan on which all economists agree.
So, do we cut taxes and hope the money filters down from the rich to the poor? It didn't work before, so I don't think it would now. Do we throw hundreds of billions at the problem and hope it goes away? We've tried that before and it didn't pull us completely out of The Great Depression.
The real solutions to the problems we face are innovative ideas that are bold and different. The trouble is that government, whether it's Conservative-leaning or Liberal-leaning, will only dare do things that have been done before. When it comes to Washington, there really is nothing new under the sun.
If we want to solve big problems then it's time for big, bold new ideas and a brave new way of doing things.
Some of you are probably glad I'm not really the President.
Tags: Economy Depression Recession
A few years ago I wrote an article about the dangers of HFCS. I wrote it long before Pizza Hut started running TV commercials touting "No HFCS" and long before food labels started appearing on store shelves with "No HFCS" emblazoned on their labels.
Last week some new and disturbing news about HFCS came to light. It was covered in various newspapers The Washington Post, The Houston Chronicle, among others. The news about HFCS went generally unnoticed by the national cable news and broadcast networks. It should have been "breaking news", but it wasn't. You would think that the fact that mercury was found in about 50% of the samples taken from products containing HFCS, would have been of great interest to most consumers. Unfortunately most Americans never heard a thing about it.
By now we all know that we shouldn't eat too much tuna or salmon because of increased mercury levels in those kinds of oily fish. And those of us living near Lake Erie have been warned not to consume too much fish from Lake Erie because of high mercury content. Yet most of us don't know that a lot of the HFCS, so ubiquitous in American foods, is contaminated with mercury as well. If you live in the United States, you cannot avoid HFCS as easily as you can avoid tuna or salmon. HFCS is an ingredient found almost everything you eat and drink.
A hopeful sign for the future is that those of us living in the United States are slowly beginning to see HFCS (high fructose corn syrup) disappearing from our foods. This is a good thing. And I hope that sooner, rather than later, we will see a return to the use of sugar as the main sweetener in our foods and beverages. It's going to be a rough road back to sugar though. For if ever there was an example of the power of money it's the long, not-so-sweet story of HFCS. HFCS is cheaper that sugar. Foods in which it is used have a longer shelf life. But, mainly it's all about profit; it's all about money.
Sugar has been much maligned over the past few decades. In fact the first sign of this came some three decades ago when Kellogg's removed "sugar" from the name of some of its cereals such as "Sugar Pops" which now known as "Corn Pops". Sugar was removed from the name but not the cereal -- at first. Later on though, Kellogg's removed the sugar all right, replacing it with HFCS. Tooth decay and weight gain were the affects of eating too much sugar. HFCS' dangers are far more serious.
The Corn Refiners Association has spent millions of dollars on advertising to convince you that HFCS is a natural product, the same as sugar. Their claim is that since it comes from corn, HFCS is every bit as natural as sugar. But how natural is a product that takes this many steps and chemical reactions to make?
Indeed, corn is natural, but by the time the refining process is completed and the finished product is used in our food and drinks, it bears little resemblance to the corn from which it came. In fact, fructose is not metabolized like sucrose (sugar). While fructose is found in many fruits and vegetables, HFCS is altered chemically so that it contains an unnatural ratio of fructose to glucose - a ratio that isn't found anywhere in nature.
Natural foods are foods which are not chemically altered, yet the United States allows food processors to include the words "All Natural" on the labels of foods containing HFCS. There's nothing natural about HFCS except its source. By the time it ends up in your stomach there's nothing at all natural about it.
"...What does it matter that it was banned in Mexico and is rarely found in foods in New Zealand. Is it really that bad? Why should we care about HFCS?
There are several different names and forms of sugar, fructose, sucrose, and dextrose being three. Here we are focusing on fructose, which behaves differently than the latter two in regards to our metabolism.
Both sucrose and dextrose are broken down in our body before they ever make it to our liver, however fructose does not breakdown and reaches the liver “almost completely intact”. This feature of fructose (which in HFCS is of an even higher concentration) has been named “metabolic shunting” since the fructose is “shunted” or sidetracked towards the liver.
Fructose is used to build triglycerides in the liver, which it does by imitating insulin, causing the liver to release fatty acids into the bloodstream. The flood of fatty acids then causes muscle tissue to develop insulin resistance..." (Read the entire article here.)
If you think that quote was written by someone with their own agenda, here's a fact that even the Corn Refiners Association cannot refute: HFCS was never used in infant formula in the United States. Why do you think that is true?
I've written before about HFCS. I really believe it had a lot to do with making me more obese than I should have been, even though I was eating a lot more than I should have been. I have since tried to eliminate HFCS from my diet, but because I live in the United States, it's nearly impossible. I have almost cut out HFCS from my diet and never eat anything or drink anything where the main ingredient is HFCS (soda pop, Smucker's jellies, jams, and preserves, pancake syrup, Heinz Ketchup, et. al. ). I also never buy Kellogg's cereal, I buy General Mills or Post cereals instead. Too many of Kellogg's cereals contain HFCS. As far as I know, none of General Mill's or Post's cereals contain HFCS.
There was more bad news for consumers last week, particularly for consumers in the United States. Studies conducted by Environmental Health, researchers found detectable levels of mercury in nine of 20 samples of commercial HFCS.
According to a Washington Post article published in the January 28, 2009 editions Health section:
// -->"...Almost half of tested samples of commercial high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) contained mercury, which was also found in nearly a third of 55 popular brand-name food and beverage products where HFCS is the first- or second-highest labeled ingredient, according to two new U.S. studies.
HFCS has replaced sugar as the sweetener in many beverages and foods such as breads, cereals, breakfast bars, lunch meats, yogurts, soups and condiments. On average, Americans consume about 12 teaspoons per day of HFCS, but teens and other high consumers can take in 80 percent more HFCS than average.
'Mercury is toxic in all its forms. Given how much high-fructose corn syrup is consumed by children, it could be a significant additional source of mercury never before considered. We are calling for immediate changes by industry and the [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] to help stop this avoidable mercury contamination of the food supply,' the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy's Dr. David Wallinga, a co-author of both studies, said in a prepared statement...."
In a second study, the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP), a non-profit watchdog group, reported that nearly one in three of 55 brand-name foods contained mercury. Mercury was found most often in dairy products, dressings and condiments containing HFCS. Heinz Ketchup, dairy products like yogurts and smoothies, Kraft salad dressings all contain HFCS.
Trade associations for the corn industry discounted these studies' findings by saying "it appears" that the test methods used were out of date and therefore the results were not accurate. HFCS is cheap to make and yields enormous profits for refiners in the United States. Once again, consumers are left in the middle not knowing who to believe.
How does mercury get into HFCS in the first place? It happens during the production of HFCS. A chemical called caustic soda is used in one stage of the complicated process that turns corn into HFCS. Some of the caustic soda used in the production of HFCS is manufactured using mercury cells which contaminates it. The IATP told the Minneapolis Star Tribune that four plants in Georgia, Tennessee, Ohio and West Virginia still use "mercury-cell" technology that can lead to mercury contamination.
For U.S. food manufacturers, the advantages of HFCS are many: It extends the shelf life of products in which it is used; it is sweeter than sugar meaning less of it is needed to obtain the same sweetness; products in which HFCS is used look "fresher"; it is cheaper than sugar, thanks to the artificially high government tariffs on imported sugar cane and sugar.
Once again, we learn that it's all about money -- not about the consumer. The FDA has known mercury contaminated HFCS for four years and has done nothing about it. The corn producers and refiners and their associated lobbyists and associations have mounted massive and expensive campaigns to convince you that HFCS is a natural product. Using the same logic, paint thinners and solvents made using peanut oil would be natural products too.
The whole truth about HFCS has yet to be revealed, but the evidence against it is mounting. There are many who are convinced that the introduction of massive amounts of HFCS into the human food chain in the 1970's, particularly in the United States, has led to increased obesity and a pandemic of type II diabetes.
HFCS is not a "natural" product. Take a look at the processes involved in its manufacturing. If you live in the United States, you'll find it nearly impossible to completely eliminate HFCS from your diet. But there's a reason that companies who manufacture infant formula are not permitted to use HFCS. There's a reason why countries like Japan and Mexico ban HFCS from food products. With all the money being spend by corn producers, refiners, and trade associations to obfuscate the facts and convince you that HFCS is a natural product, it becomes increasingly hard for consumers to get to the truth.
It seems to me that the less HFCS you consume the better off you'll be. Once again, it's not about you and me, it's all about the money. HFCS is cheaper and using it increases profits -they win and we lose. That's the truth as I see it.
Tags: HFCS Corn Sugar Food Diabetes Obesity
You can help save your personal email program by sharing this page with a friend.
This article is based on our experiences with Windows Live Mail. While it is based on fact and our own personal experiences with it, it is, in the final analysis, only our opinion. We want to make it crystal clear that these are our opinions, based on observation and fact. We'd like your opinion too. At the bottom of this article is a link to a page where you can write and publish an opinion or express your thoughts. We hope you will take time to do this.
Microsoft will not be offering you a free personal email program with the next version of Windows. They'll be trying to convince you that Windows Live Mail is the "next generation" of personal email programs. It is not. It's a "cloud computing" application that exposes your private data, mail accounts, messages, and any personal information contained in them to much higher risks than if you stored such important information only on your own computer - such has been the case with Outlook Express and Windows Mail. Microsoft has what we call a "propaganda campaign" to make you believe that Windows Live Mail is the mail program of the future. It is not. The following then, is our opinion of Windows Live Mail and why you should be expressing your outrage at Microsoft for taking the personal email program out of Windows 7 - the next version of Windows.
We've been known to get all cranked up about spyware, adware, and hijackers. We've been known to blow a gasket when it comes to companies bundling garbage - so instead of getting just the program you thought you were downloading you get a bunch of garbage you don't want. FunWebProducts, a notorious adware/spyware/hijacker that bundles 18 or more programs after conning poor, unwary netizens into downloading its "SmileyCentral" hijacker/adware program - comes to mind.
But never, ever, did we ever think that someday we would be writing about Microsoft in the same article as FunWebProducts, adware, spyware, and hijackers. So, today is a sad day. Microsoft, stooping to new lows, has its own bundle of garbage called "Windows Live Mail". It's adware for sure - if you use a Hotmail or MSN account it will insert ads into your outgoing mail surreptitiously - you don't see it but your recipient will. It's a home page hijacker - it will change your home page from whatever it is to MSN. It's Cloud Computing application - meaning that all your messages, user accounts - even those personal accounts your ISP gives you, passwords, and other personal information, is hanging right up there in the cloud - an accident waiting to happen. If someone with a password cracking program harvests your emails addresses it's a simple matter to crack your password and see every mail you've ever sent or every message you've saved including private confidential mail from your bank, savings institution, software companies who've sent you keys, private family messages and more.
It's one thing to have a Hotmail account and use if for certain things - but quite another to have ALL of your email addresses in one location on the Web. Your ISP accounts, your Hotmail account, your Gmail account, etc. When you put all of your eggs in one highly visible basket, you're just asking for a basketful of trouble.
And it's bad enough that Microsoft even offers Windows Live Mail, but to think that in the next version of Windows - which is only nine months away, there will be no personal email program like Windows Mail". You'll have no choice but to use Windows Live Mail because Windows 7 will have no desktop-based, personal email program like Outlook Express or Windows Mail. All you'll have is Windows Live Mail. Millions more of you will be forced to store all your private email account information, messages, and so forth on Microsoft's servers - where it's only a password cracker away from some criminal's hands.
Oh, you do have a choice. You can use Outlook - for which you'll have to fork over $150 - or install Microsoft Office for about $400. Or you can use Thunderbird, which is far less capable than Outlook Express or Windows Mail. There's a bevy of other free email programs too - but none of them are nearly as good as Outlook Express or Windows Mail. Besides, why should you have to go out and learn a new email program after all these years?
Microsoft isn't doing this for you. They're doing it for Microsoft. More specifically they're doing it to make more money. Yes, once again, Microsoft is going to stick it to its customers by not giving you what you want, but giving you what they want. No wonder Apple and Linux are starting to erode Microsoft's stranglehold on the computer market. They're taking away your personal email program and giving you a glorified Hotmail desktop - a browser that looks like an email program and where all your private messages and other personal information are stored in the "Cloud".
Microsoft's decision making of late leaves us scratching our heads. Windows 7 isn't going to be a brand new version of Windows as promised. It's going to be one giant Windows Vista service pack for which you're going to pay $100 or more. Windows 7 isn't about making Windows better, it's about making money. It reminds us of Windows ME which Microsoft threw together to quell uneasy stockholders. Microsoft made XP too good. Now they can't top it. So, instead of concentrating on making a whole new version of Windows with more features customers want - like faster boot-ups and shutdowns, better performance using less resources, they've decided to make Windows more like Mac - i.e. make it prettier. Windows 7 is a glorified Windows Vista. It's not the brand new operating system that it was supposed to be. It's all about the money with Microsoft and Windows Live Mail is another example of highly-educated people making really dumb decisions. Does General Motors ring any bells?
Let's talk about installing Windows Live Mail. It's a bundle. I don't care if they give you the option NOT to install the programs they bundle with it, all the programs are checked by default and many people will simply click "OK" and install the other programs - instead of the program they "wanted" to download - Windows Live Mail. It's software bundling - just as much as it's software bundling when some "freeware" program tries to get you to install Yahoo Toolbar with it. You may have the option to select or deselect but Microsoft is not stupid -they know that a majority of people will leave all the boxes checked (which they are by default) and install everything in the bundle- and you can bet your bottom dollar that they want you install all of these programs.
* Windows Live Mail
* Photo Gallery
* Movie Maker beta
* Family Safety
* Microsoft Silverlight
* And even more stuff - depending on what you have already installed.
To add another breach of trust, Microsoft wants to hijack your preferred search provider and your home page. These boxes are both checked by default. Anyone installing Windows Live Mail and not paying attention and just clicking "OK" will find they have a new search provider and a new home page the next time they open their browser. If Microsoft was doing this the fair way, those boxes would be unchecked by default and you'd have to check them if YOU wanted to switch search providers - and home pages. Microsoft seems to be unwilling to admit that a ten year-old start up beat their britches off in the search provider game. Here's a hint for Microsoft: If you want to win the search provider game, make your search engine better than Google's and make your main search page simple like Google's instead of that bloated, ad-filled, ostentatious, eye-sore you have. People go to search page to search page to search not to be bombarded with ads and dazzled with page design. Here, take a look, http://msn.com/ compared to http://google.com/ .
It's not bad enough that Microsoft makes a game of hide-and-seek out of installing Windows Live Mail, but the preposterous idea of replacing the popular Outlook Express/Windows Mail with Windows Live Mail, just blows us away. Who makes these kinds of bone-headed decisions? Microsoft apparently doesn't care what you want or what you like, they'll spend zillions of dollars convincing you something less secure, with less features, is somehow better. "Everything in one place" they like say. Indeed. Everything in one place - a really dandy idea. Now, if we lived in a perfect world where there were no criminals or where everyone used secure twenty-eight-character, nearly-impossible-to-crack passwords, it might a good thing. A huge target for hackers and password stealers, Windows Live Mail is a virtual ocean of private, personal, and sensitive information all sitting there in one place waiting to be snatched up by miscreants with highly sophisticated password crackers - or sophisticated computer nerds who would like nothing better that breach Microsoft's Live servers. I guess the good thing about it is, someday we'll be able to write an article featuring our four favorite words: "We told you so!" Government servers and other sensitive servers are hacked all the time - but not even these servers have the quality of content hackers and password thieves drool over. They crack your Live Mail password, they have access to all your email, all its content, all your passwords, and more. If your bank sent you a Lost Password request in email, then they have that. They'll have whatever you have in your Outlook Express or Windows Mail folders right now.
Air-headed, money-driven decisions such as Microsoft's decision to remove your personal email client from Windows and replacing it with a Web-based, "cloud computing" mail program that is disguised as a personal email program- where every bit of your personal data is stored both in the "Cloud" and on your computer makes not one bit of sense - unless you're Microsoft, of course. The only reason for this decision is to provide an additional source of revenue - a source that wasn't being tapped before - and that source is your personal, private email. It's wrong and this decision will end up costing Microsoft a lot of credibility and a lot of lost customers.
There is absolutely no benefit to anyone other than Microsoft by eliminating the personal, private, desktop mail application from Windows 7. It's all about money and Microsoft will continue to decline while others, like Google, who find out what people want and then provides it, will continue to eat away at Microsoft, until all that's left of Microsoft is what they used to be.
If you agree that this decision by Microsoft to leave your personal email program out of the next version of Windows is wrong and that it again points out why Microsoft continues to lose sales to innovators like Apple, please express your opinion by leaving a comment at the bottom of this page. Maybe there is someone who cares about you more than money at Microsoft who will listen. Maybe if enough of you voice your opinion, we can get them to listen. Otherwise, in a few months the era of the personal email client from Microsoft is over and an era of breaches and security nightmares will begin. The only ones who will be hurt by this ill-advised decision will be everyone who uses Windows Live Mail, who installs Windows 7 or who buys a computer with Windows 7 pre-installed on it. And eventually that will be all of us.
You can help save your personal email program by sharing this page with a friend.
Tags: Microsoft Security Windows Mail Outlook Express Windows Live Mail
For one brief but ugly moment last week I deserted the cynic inside me. I left the comfort of cynicism intoxicated by the sweet poison of hope. Don't worry. I'm back in full vigor now. No more rose-colored glasses for me. There is comfort in cynicism. I have my blankie back. I am my old cynical self again.
This Sunday is "Super Bowl Sunday". I notice that restaurants and some stores in my little town are closing early because of it. I find it odd that Bob Evans, which closed at 8:00PM on Christmas Eve, is closing at 7:00PM on Super Bowl Sunday. The sign on the door says "We will be closing at 7:00PM on Sunday, February 1, 2009 for the Super Bowl." The store where I buy my daily newspaper also has a sign on its door. The sign reads: "We will be closing at 8:00PM on Sunday, February 1, 2009 for the Super Bowl." That store closed at 10:00PM on Christmas Eve. You have to love this.
The USA is tumbling headlong into a full-fledged Depression (capital "D" indeed) yet every grocery store I've visited has aisles full of chips, beer, pop and snacks all presented in a gala "Super Bowl Party" settings. Festive banners and ribbons and streamers abound. No one would ever guess the USA was in deep economic hot water or fighting in two wars. Unemployment is skyrocketing; financial markets are collapsing; people are being tossed out of their foreclosed homes in record numbers; factories and businesses are closing. "What me worry?"
Restaurants in my town are closing early, because it seems they think that everyone will be home eating pizza rolls, pizza, sandwiches, and drinking beer? What about me? Or are the using the Super Bowel as an excuse to send employees home early and save a few bucks on those outrageous minimum wage salaries? I am not going to watch the Super Bowl. I might want to go out to eat after 7PM or buy a newspaper after 8PM. I have no choice but to sit home and brood. One thing for sure I will not watch the Super Bowl or care what the score is -- or who won.
Whatever network is carrying the game is off the air from 12:00 noon until 12:00 midnight as far as I'm concerned. Did you hear that coverage of the game starts at 12:00 noon Eastern Time? Guess when kickoff is? Kickoff is at 6:28PM. Guess when the game will end? I'm guessing somewhere around 10:30PM. You know they have a lot of high-dollar commercials to squeeze in. Lots of "TV timeouts". The last time I watched a football game on TV, my beloved Ohio State Buckeyes versus The Texas Longhorns in the "Fiesta Bowl", the commercials were so long I almost forgot what was going on in the game. The Buckeyes didn't prevail though. They lost but I digress.
All this hoopla over a football game between two teams from the same league who've played before? The Arizona Cardinals versus The Pittsburgh Steelers, that's who's playing, right? And this is a big game; why?
People are paying hundreds of dollars, even thousands of dollars, for tickets to the Super Bowl. In case you want to go, you can't --it's sold out. Companies are paying tens of millions of dollars to advertise during the Super Bowl. People are spending their last dollars on junk food, beer, and soda pop for their "Super Bowl Parties" yet we're on the cusp of a Depression? We must look like fools to the rest of the world. We have become a bunch of infantile whiners who complain about losing our jobs and our homes while we spend money we supposedly don't have on potato chips, Fritos, Pepsi, chip dip, Miller Lite, Bud Lite, and other nutritious foods that build strong bellies twelve ways. It's important to have a Super Bowl Party and sit a around a 52" plasma TV - it's only $88.00 a month - and guzzle alcohol while unabashedly engaging in gluttonous revelry. All because why? Becuase the Pittsburgh Steelers are playing the Arizona Cardinals? It doesn't seem very fair, does it? A city against a whole state? Tomorrow those same revelers will be complaining they don't have they money to pay their mortgages or buy gas for the SUVs. Will you feel sorry for them?
One more thing, if you're one of those people who doesn't care about football but are going to watch it for the commercials, let me tell you something. Those commercials cost millions of dollars per minute. Do you think Budweiser, PepsiCo, and the other advertisers are actually paying for those? Really? They're not, you know. You're paying for those. Every dollar they spend gets figured into their cost of doing business and when the cost gets too high and their profits get too low they'll raise the price of their products and you'll end up paying that price. So laugh at the commercials if you want. Just remember, in the end, those companies are going to stick it to you and they'll have the last laugh. Take a look at how much PepsiCo paid in bonuses to their executives last year. Still laughing? If you really want to laugh and save time, just visit www.youtube.com the day after the game. You can watch all the commercials there without sitting through 3 1/2 hours of football. You can even watch YouTube videos while you chomp on chips and swill beer. I know. I've done it.
If there is anyone else out there who isn't taken in by all the hyperbole -- you folks in Pittsburgh are excused --- you're welcome to come to my Anti-Super Bowl Party. It starts at 7:00PM. At 8:00PM I'm going to insert a DVD movie into my old DVD-player and watch "Ground Hog Day". I'm having snacks too. You can have your choice of salad or you can choose one of my Lean Cuisine frozen dinners. If you get the munchies, I have pretzel rods. And, I have beer and I think there is some wine left over from Christmas - you can have your choice. I didn't buy any extra food, munchies or beverages for my Anti-Super Bowl Party. I will eat the stuff I already have. If I run out, you'll just have to settle for the movie on my little 25" LCD TV. No 52" plasma TV here. I have plenty of coffee and water though. So if you get thirsty and the beer and wine are gone, you can have your choice between coffee or water. You won't go thirsty at my Anti-Super Bowl Party. I might have a few jelly donuts too. Don't complain though - when they're gone, they're gone. But---don't come early just for the jelly donuts. I will not answer the door before 7:00PM. I probably won't be dressed properly until then.
The movie should be over by 9:45, so you'll get home in plenty of time to get some sleep so you can get up for work the next morning. We don't have any "post movie" interviews scheduled. We don't have any camera crews in the locker room of the ground hog. When the movie is over, you'll be expected to leave without delay. By 10:00PM I'll be ready for bed - bleary eyed and sleepy. You can only come to my Anti-Super Bowl party if you promise to leave right after the movie is over. We're not going to sit around and talk or pretend to enjoy each other's company. I'll be hospitable as long as you're quiet during the movie and don't complain about the food. You can have all you want to drink but if I run out, you'll either have to leave or go without. It's the best I can do. We're on the verge of a Depression here, and I am not going out to buy a bunch of junk just because you're coming to my Anti-Super Bowl Party. If my party sounds like a great evening to you, you're my kind of person.
Tags: Super Bowl Party Thundercloud
I don't know about you, but I found this year's historic Presidential Inauguration fascinating. Watching a sea of people, of all races, backgrounds, religions and nationalities, waving American flags in celebration was a site that sent chills through me.
Watching the reaction of people in other countries celebrating with us was uplifting too. We've been travelling a dark and deleterious road since 9/11 and we're going through some very tough times right now. I felt as if some of our best friends in the world had been looking at the United States with a cautious eye - fearful of the course America has been on.
On Inauguration Day they saw renewed hope and a renaissance of freedom; they saw a new generation taking the reigns of government inspired by a new leader who believes he can make America - and the world - a better place. I'm one of those who believes that America, must adhere to the principles prescribed by the founding fathers; who believes that security and freedom are not mutually exclusive. Thomas Jefferson once wrote - and I paraphrase - that when we give up a little liberty for a little security we end up having neither liberty or security.
Inauguration Day was a special day. It was a celebration of freedom. It was a time of change and of renewal. For the first time in a long time we felt the sun shining on our faces. We felt a revived American spirit regardless of our own political beliefs. For one brief and historic moment, we the people were one.
Hope is such a restorative thing.
Inauguration Day was not about one man. It was not about Barack Obama. It was not about George W. Bush. It was about us, you and me - indeed it was about every American citizen. Our Declaration Of Independence and our Constitution both emphasize that our government is a government "of the people, by the people and for the people".
Over the past years we've turned our backs on some of those the essential principles our forebears prescribed over two-hundred and thirty years ago. But today is not about yesterday, it's about tomorrow. Though the challenges we face as a nation are grave and the road ahead will call for great sacrifice and patience - we won't be travelling alone in the dark anymore. The light of hope is shining on the road ahead. And although that road is full of challenges and hard choices, the light of hope shines down upon us all and lights the way ahead.
Today the world seems a little brighter, our friends seem a little friendlier, our enemies seem a little less contentious, our cause seems a little more just, our liberty seems more secure, and the world seems a little less cynical.
The time has come for us work together, celebrating the things which unite us, not dwelling upon those things which divide us. It's time to put away childish things.
"When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things." (1 Corinthians 13:11)
The time has come to allow old wounds to heal. It's time to forgive. It's time to come together as one people for the common good. In the final analysis, we are not Conservatives and Liberals or Democrats and Republicans, we are Americans. And as Americans we are citizens of the world.
We live in a brave new world where the divisions of vast oceans and the distances between continents grow smaller every day. We can no longer live in isolation and disregard the consequences of our actions. We can, more than any other country on Earth, inspire people everywhere to aspire to greater things.
Together there is nothing we can't do; divided there is little we can do. We need to give our new President our support and our encouragement. We need to give him a chance. We will not agree with every decision and we will not agree with every course of action. The problems we face as a nation are many and they are serious. But together as a nation we can meet every challenge and solve every problem if we face them as one people. We can no longer afford to let cynics divide us as children divided into opposing teams on a school playground. We cannot allow that to happen anymore.
With hope to light the way and with patience to temper our expectations, let's all wish Barack Obama the very best. Keep him in your thoughts and prayers. If he fails, then we all fail - but if he succeeds then we all succeed - and the world will be a better place.
John Lennon once called upon a generation to "give peace a chance". Our generation has now been called to "give hope a chance". It's time to come together and give hope a chance. With hope to light the road ahead and a renewed sense of purpose to bring us all together, we will be able to meet every challenge and solve every problem we face, no matter how difficult they may be.
John F. Kennedy, concluded his Inaugural address this way - and the spirit of these words still echoes as true today as they did forty-eight years ago:
"...Finally, whether you are citizens of America or citizens of the world, ask of us here the same high standards of strength and sacrifice which we ask of you. With a good conscience our only sure reward, with history the final judge of our deeds, let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God's work must truly be our own."
Tags: Obama Hope Politics America World
What a bleak and dreary morning.
Once there was a time when I could hear the sound of birds singing and feel the warmth of the sun washing over this room. Today, though, there is only cold and dark and bittersweet memories of days long passed.
For all the pleasure - and pain - they bring, it is too bad that memories aren't more useful; memories can be beautiful or discomforting; full of joy or overwhelming sorrow . They are as fragile as an angel's gossamer wings and as fleeting as a falling star streaking across a clear midnight sky. Memories can be as whimsical and as useless as a shadow dancing on a placid, twilight bay and as necessary as the air we breathe. Memories are ethereal enigmas - we know they are there but they are as intangible as a distant rainbow.
Memories are the only link we have to what we used to be. Memories make us who we are. We are the sum total of our memories. Without them we would not be who were are. Indeed, memories are the bridges to yesterday; they are the only way we have to go back across the never ending river of time.
These fragile wisps of memory are not accurate glimpses of our pasts, they are surrealistic watercolors painted by the crafty hand of our subconscious minds; they may look far better than they really are. Memories, like old paintings, become faded with time. The happy times seem happier and the sad times seem sadder - and nothing we remember is quite the way it really was.
But, how can we measure such ethereal things? How can we measure the accuracy of our own memories? No one knows our thoughts and memories better than we know our own. I'm sure nothing I remember is the way it really was. Yet memories are all we have; memories are all we are.
Even though memories may be fleeting, distorted glimpses of the past, they are the only links we have between what we are and what we used to be; between what we were and what we may be tomorrow.
Memories are all we will have left when everything else is gone. Sometimes, by the end of our lives, even our memories are taken from us leaving us without a friend - even our own "selves" have left us. To be old and alone without a single memory is the saddest place we can ever be.
On this strange and cold winter morning, memories of spring float quietly through my mind. The memories I have of spring bring both hope. for the spring to come, and a yearning for watercolor springs I knew as a boy, when I stood among the blooming things, my hands pulling at the strings of dancing kites.
I'm not sure how I should feel this morning, but I am glad that I have so many memories. They are the bridges to yesterday.
Tags: Reflection Meditation Spring Memories